A review of retractions in medical and biological peer-reviewed journals finds the percentage of studies that had to be withdrawn because of scientific misconduct has jumped several-fold since the mid-1970s.
In this 2010 file photo, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, who authored a fraudulent paper linking certain vaccinations to autism, speaks in Chicago. Fraud in scientific research, while still rare, is growing at an alarming rate, a new study finds. A review of retractions in medical and biological peer-reviewed journals finds the percentage of studies that had to be retracted because of scientific misconduct has jumped several-fold since the mid-1970s.
Charles Rex Arbogas/AP
EnlargeA new study finds that fraud in scientific research is growing at a troubling rate, even though it remains rare overall.
Skip to next paragraph' +
google_ads[0].line2 + '
' +
google_ads[0].line3 + '
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
A review of retractions in medical and biological peer-reviewed journals finds the percentage of studies that had to be withdrawn because of scientific misconduct has jumped several-fold since the mid-1970s.
The study says fraud or suspected fraud is by far the biggest reason for retractions, outweighing errors and plagiarism.
Fraud is detected only a handful of times for every 100,000 studies published. Study author Arturo Casadevall says a few scientific scofflaws cause big problems that can hurt people. He says one reason may be pressure to hit it big in?science.
The study is published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of?Sciences.
hall of fame occupy dc ufc 143 fight card my fair lady conversion disorder the chronicle spinal stenosis
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.